| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 49 Number 6
Volume 49 Number 5
Volume 49S Number 1
Volume 49 Number 4
Volume 49 Number 3
Volume 49 Number 2
Earlier issues
Volume  Number 

next article

Research articles

ScienceAsia 44 (2018): 1-10 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2018.44.001

Soil CO2 emissions measured by closed chamber and soil gradient methods in dry dipterocarp forest and sweet sorghum plots

Apaporn˙Bulsathaporna,b,c, Duangrat˙Suekhuma,b, Phongthep˙Hanpattanakita,b,d, Montri˙Sanwangsria,b,e, Amnat˙Chidthaisonga,b,*, Sirintornthep˙Towprayoona,b, Kazuyuki˙Inubushif, Pitayakon˙Limtongg

ABSTRACT:     Soil respiration as a major component of the carbon cycle has received considerable attention because of its role in amplifying global warming and in climate feedbacks of ecosystems. This makes it important for us to devise reliable methods in order to measure soil CO2 effluxes accurately. In this study, we investigated the variations of CO2 effluxes for 93˙days in sweet sorghum plots and a dry dipterocarp forest by closed chamber and soil gradient methods. The results show that both sites had similar patterns of soil CO2 emission but CO2 emission from the sweet sorghum plots was 4˙times higher than from the dry dipterocarp forest. Over the study period, the average soil CO2 efflux and accumulative emission from the dry dipterocarp forest were 360±129˙mg CO2 m−2 h−1 and 34˙g CO2 m−2 and from the sweet sorghum plots they were 2456±614˙mg CO2 m−2 h−1 and 235˙g CO2 m−2, respectively. Continuous and high temporal-resolution measurements based on the soil gradient method also enabled us to detect the response of soil CO2 efflux to environmental drivers. We found that rainfall and irrigation events in a short time period could significantly enhance the magnitude of soil CO2 effluxes. In addition, we also found that an appropriate time for daily soil CO2 measurements was around noon.

Download PDF

280 Downloads 2216 Views

a The˙Joint˙Graduate˙School˙of˙Energy˙and˙Environment, King˙Mongkut's˙University˙of˙Technology˙Thonburi, Bangkok˙10140˙Thailand
b Centre˙of˙Excellence˙on˙Energy˙Technology˙and˙Environment, PERDO, Bangkok˙10140˙Thailand
c Faculty˙of˙Public˙and˙Environmental˙Health, Huachiew˙Chalermprakiet˙University, Bangkok˙10540˙Thailand
d Faculty˙of˙Environmental˙Culture˙and˙Ecotourism, Srinakharinwirot˙University, Bangkok˙10110˙Thailand
e School˙of˙Energy˙and˙Environment, University˙of˙Phayao, Phayao˙56000˙Thailand
f Graduate˙School˙of˙Horticulture, Chiba˙University, Chiba˙271-8510˙Japan
g Land˙Development˙Department, Bangkok˙10900˙Thailand

* Corresponding author, E-mail: amnat_c@jgsee.kmutt.ac.th

Received 19 Aug 2015, Accepted 12 Sep 2017