| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 48 Number 6
Volume 48 Number 5
Volume 48 Number 4
Volume 48 Number 3
Volume 48 Number 2
Volume 48S Number 1
Earlier issues
Volume 44 Number 2 Volume 44 Number 3 Volume 44 Number 4

previous article next article

Research articles

ScienceAsia 44 (2018): 179-186 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2018.44.179

Determination of antioxidant activity of gum arabic: An exudation from two different locations

Mohamed˙E.S.˙Mirghania,b,*, Ahmed˙A.M.˙Elnoura,c, N.A.˙Kabbashia, Md˙Z.˙Alama, Khalid˙Hamid˙Musad, Amina˙Abdullahd

ABSTRACT:     Gum arabic (GA) is the main product of acacia trees. As a raw and commercial samples, GA was extracted with methanol and analysed to measure the antioxidant activity using five methods: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin-Ciocalteu indexes (FCI), which indicate total phenolic compounds (TPC), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC). This study used antioxidant assays to detect TPC and selected appropriate and inexpensive methods to determine the antioxidant capacity of GA samples. The results reveal that the FCI, ORAC, and CUPRAC are correlated highly with FRAP. Person's correlation coefficient (r) values are 0.98, 0.93, and 0.99, respectively, based on the sample size of (n=8). This means that the TPC of GA is highly correlated with their antioxidant activities that are measured by these three methods. Hence the FCI, ORAC, and the CUPRAC methods are more effective and simpler. They had similar predictive power to the FRAP of GA antioxidant activity. Consequently, GA is generally recognized as being slightly acidic which may have been obtained from appropriate methods of the antioxidant capacity detection. This acidity is due to the electronic transfer mechanism based on the selection of the working pH.

Download PDF

118 Downloads 1246 Views

a Bioenvironmental˙Engineering˙Research˙Centre, Biotechnology˙Engineering, Faculty˙of˙Engineering, International˙Islamic˙University, Malaysia, PO˙Box˙10, Gombak˙50728˙Kuala˙Lumpur, Malaysia
b International˙Institute˙for˙Halal˙Research˙and˙Training, ˙International˙Islamic˙University˙Malaysia, PO˙Box˙10, Gombak˙50728˙Kuala˙Lumpur, Malaysia
c Department˙of˙Biochemistry˙&˙Gum˙Processing, Gum˙Arabic˙Research˙Centre, University˙of˙Kordofan, Box˙160˙Elobied, Sudan
d School˙of˙Chemical˙Sciences˙&˙Food˙Technology, Faculty˙of˙Science˙&˙Technology, 43600˙UKM, Bangi˙Selangor, Malaysia

* Corresponding author, E-mail: elwathig@iium.edu.my

Received 1 Jun 2017, Accepted 22 Apr 2018